Skip to content
CUNICULA

SimpleX Chat

Decentralized encrypted messenger with no user IDs, connecting through invitation links or QR codes.

simplex.chat

Decentralized encrypted messenger with no user IDs, connecting through invitation links or QR codes.

Common useMessagingMessagingOperator dataHosted
Identity checksZero KYCNo document check recorded · identity exposure level 0/4
Evidence and riskVerified evidenceCautionMaterial claims checked against current sources.; those sources show trade-offs worth reading.
Last reviewedReviewed 27 Aug 2026KYC checked 27 Aug 2026 · verified jurisdiction · Source → official siteHow to cite this pageSource coverageVerified evidenceRecorded riskCaution
Evidence and facts

Evidence and facts

CUNICULA SCORE 4.0
74/100Reviewed evidencePrivacy 17/25 · Control 18/20 · Transparency 12/20 · Security 17/25 · Accountability 10/10 · Method
JURISDICTIONUK
CAUTIONUK company under Five Eyes jurisdiction; existing investor caveats remain. The core privacy advantage is protocol-level absence of global user identifiers, not immunity from endpoint/support metadata.
AUDITED BYNo audit listed
OPERATOR DATAHosted operator recorded
SOURCE COVERAGE
Verified evidenceTHIRD-PARTY REPORTED9/11Reviewed 27 Aug 2026 · Source → official site
LAST CHECKED2026-08-27
LAST UPDATED2026-08-27

Specs

DOCUMENT CHECKNone recorded
IDENTITY EXPOSURELevel 0/4
KYC TRIGGERSNo phone number, username, global account or document KYC required for normal messaging. Contacting support by email exposes ordinary email metadata to mail providers.
FEEFree
NETWORKSFOSS, Mobile, Desktop, Terminal
CATEGORIESMessaging
TORNot listed
REGIONSGlobal availability
Review analysis, source material, related services, and history

Analysis

OVERVIEW

SimpleX Chat's protocol assigns no user identifiers at all, not even random ones; contacts connect only through exchanged links or QR codes, and SimpleX Chat Ltd publishes transparency reports.

LIMITS

SimpleX Chat Ltd is UK-incorporated and subject to the Investigatory Powers Act, and the record notes Village Global, whose limited partners include Bezos, Gates and Zuckerberg, as an investor. The no-identifier design covers the protocol itself, not support-email metadata.

USEFUL FOR

Messaging where protocol-level absence of user identifiers matters more than avoiding a UK-based, Five Eyes-jurisdiction company.

Sources · reviewed 2026-07-16

Corporate identity

Registry-sourced, not audited. The facts below come from cited web research rather than a direct registry query. Each claim links its own source.

LEGAL ENTITY
SIMPLEX CHAT LTDsource ↗
REGISTRATION NO.
13691484source ↗
INCORPORATED IN
United Kingdom (England and Wales)source ↗
INCORPORATED ON
2021-10-20source ↗
REGISTERED ADDRESS
20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GUsource ↗
ULTIMATE OWNER
Evgeny Poberezkin (PSC, ownership of shares 75% or more)source ↗
OFFICERS
  • Evgeny Poberezkin (Director, appointed 2021-10-20)
  • Evgeny Poberezkin (Secretary, appointed 2021-10-20)
source ↗
Registry research · reviewed 2026-08-09

Frequently Asked Questions

Is identity verification required?

No identity verification is recorded for typical use. No phone number, username, global account or document KYC required for normal messaging. Contacting support by email exposes ordinary email metadata to mail providers.

Which payment methods are accepted?

Accepted payment methods: FOSS, Mobile, Desktop, Terminal.

Where is it available?

Recorded availability: GLOBAL.

Is the operator based in a Five Eyes country?

Yes. The recorded jurisdiction is UK, a Five Eyes country (US, UK, CA, AU, NZ). This is jurisdiction context and does not by itself establish that a service is safer or less safe.

How are identity, operator, and evidence fields reported?

Identity exposure is level 0 of 4. A hosted operator is recorded. Jurisdiction is shown as context, not a safety verdict. Source coverage is verified evidence, last reviewed 2026-08-27, and recorded risk is caution.

Which payment networks are supported?

Accepted networks: FOSS, Mobile, Desktop, Terminal.

Related Services

Compare

Sources and history

Terms and privacy policy

No changes to the document we watch since we started checking on 9 Aug 2026. Last checked 9 Aug 2026.

Evidence basis: Claims on this page are linked to published sources for comparison, not certification, audit, endorsement, or recommendation; read the methodology and coverage map before relying on an entry.