Evidence and risk△Partial evidence/■StandardSome material claims still need confirmation.; no material risk recorded in them.
Last reviewedReviewed 25 Aug 2026KYC checked 25 Aug 2026 · unknown jurisdiction · Source → official siteHow to cite this pageSource coveragePartial evidenceRecorded riskStandard
Evidence and facts
Evidence and facts
CUNICULA SCORE 4.0
43/100△Limited evidencePrivacy 12/25 · Control 0/20 · Transparency 0/20 · Security 25/25 · Accountability 6/10 · Cap 69 · Method
JURISDICTIONUnknown
NOTEI2P is optimized for internal hidden services, not clearnet exit browsing; privacy depends on correct client/app configuration and threat model.
AUDITED BYNo audit listed
OPERATOR DATAUnknown
SOURCE COVERAGE
△Partial evidenceTHIRD-PARTY REPORTED1/3Reviewed 25 Aug 2026 · Source → official site
LAST CHECKED2026-08-25
LAST UPDATED2026-08-25
Specs
DOCUMENT CHECKNone recorded
IDENTITY EXPOSURELevel 0/4
KYC TRIGGERSNo account, payment or identity KYC to download and run the open-source network software.
FEEFree
NETWORKSFOSS, P2P
CATEGORIESNetworking
FEATURESLayered encrypted routing, Volunteer-operated nodes, Internal hidden services, Open source, Post-quantum NTCP2 transport (2.13.0), DNS-like address book, BitTorrent and messaging applications
TORNot listed
REGIONSGlobal availability
Review analysis, source material, related services, and history
Analysis
OVERVIEW
An overlay network built inward-first: hidden services and peer-to-peer applications inside the network, with every participant relaying traffic through layered encrypted tunnels.
LIMITS
It is not designed for browsing the ordinary web, the network and therefore the anonymity set are smaller than Tor's, and the privacy properties depend on correct application configuration.
USEFUL FOR
Hosting or reaching internal services where the traffic never needs to exit to the clearnet.
Registry-sourced, not audited. The facts below come from cited web research rather than a direct registry query. Each claim links its own source.
Registry research · reviewed 2026-08-09
Frequently Asked Questions
Is identity verification required?
No identity verification is recorded for typical use. No account, payment or identity KYC to download and run the open-source network software.
Which payment methods are accepted?
Accepted payment methods: FOSS, P2P.
Where is it available?
Recorded availability: GLOBAL.
Is the operator based in a Five Eyes country?
The jurisdiction is not publicly confirmed. Check the provider site for incorporation details.
How are identity, operator, and evidence fields reported?
Identity exposure is level 0 of 4. Hosted operator data has not been established. Jurisdiction is shown as context, not a safety verdict. Source coverage is partial evidence, last reviewed 2026-08-25, and recorded risk is standard.
Which payment networks are supported?
Accepted networks: FOSS, P2P.
Related Services
Lokinetlokinet.orglokinet.org · Privacy Tools · AU
No changes to the documents we watch since we started checking on 9 Aug 2026. Last checked 9 Aug 2026.
Evidence basis: Claims on this page are linked to published sources for comparison, not certification, audit, endorsement, or recommendation; read the methodology and coverage map before relying on an entry.
Service history
Latest meaningful changes to the facts shown on this provider page.
Corporate registry information updated
Corporate
Make service ratings transparent
Evidence status
Provider presentation updated
Best for, Evidence status, Recorded risk, Tagline, and 1 more
Full service history
updated
Reconcile score 4.0 evidence
Score assessment / Control model
decentralized → unknown
Score assessment / Operator data exposure
limited → unknown
Score assessment / Source model
open → unknown
Score review
not set → Outcome: PASS; Checked at: 2026-08-25; Inputs: Operator data exposure: unknown; Control model: unknown; Source model: unknown; Audit: Score eligible: no; Reason: No dated, scoped, current audit citation was normalized in the reviewed packet; legacy auditedBy labels receive no score credit.
not set → Layered encrypted routing, Volunteer-operated nodes, Internal hidden services, Open source, Post-quantum NTCP2 transport (2.13.0), DNS-like address book, BitTorrent and messaging applications
KYC last checked
2026-06-22 → 2026-08-25
Last reviewed
2026-06-22 → 2026-08-25
Source reviewed
official site → primary_source_rereview_2026-08-25
Score assessment
not set → Operator data exposure: limited; Control model: decentralized; Source model: open
Decentralized privacy-focused network for anonymous internal services, messaging and data sharing. Official site says traffic is routed through multiple encrypted layers across volunteer-operated nodes. → Decentralized network routing traffic through layered encryption across volunteer-operated nodes.
A fully decentralized, peer-to-peer darknet. Unlike Tor (which is optimized for exiting to the clearnet), I2P is optimized for hidden services and internal secure routing. → Decentralized privacy-focused network for anonymous internal services, messaging and data sharing. Official site says traffic is routed through multiple encrypted layers across volunteer-operated nodes.
Domain
geti2p.net → i2p.net
Jurisdiction
not set → ??
KYC last checked
2026-03-13 → 2026-06-22
Kyc note
Advertises No-KYC, but strictly adhere to OPSEC rules. Access via Tor, pay with XMR. → No account, payment or identity KYC to download and run the open-source network software.
Last reviewed
2026-03-13 → 2026-06-22
Privacy warning
not set → I2P is optimized for internal hidden services, not clearnet exit browsing; privacy depends on correct client/app configuration and threat model.
Source reviewed
older source, not independently verified → official site