Skip to content
CUNICULA
Back to directory

@lnp2pBot vs RetoSwap

Head-to-head privacy comparison: KYC friction, trust score, jurisdiction, fees, audits, supported regions, and network support. Higher trust score: @lnp2pBot.

@lnp2pBot

Zero KYC · Trust 92/99

Open-source Telegram P2P Bitcoin marketplace over Lightning hold invoices. Official site says no KYC, no registration, no identity verification and no personal data required.

Telegram P2P (Lightning)

RetoSwap

Zero KYC · Trust 89/99

Privacy-first Haveno-based P2P exchange. Official FAQ states RetoSwap cannot verify user identities; supports Monero settlement and P2P fiat/crypto methods.

P2P
@lnp2pBot vs RetoSwap privacy comparison
Metric@lnp2pBotRetoSwap
KYC levelZero KYCZero KYC
Trust score92/9989/99
Jurisdiction??
Fee0.5%0.15% maker / 0.75% taker
Countries/regionsGlobalGlobal
Features
  • TG escrow
  • LN only
  • Global
  • Haveno-based
  • XMR settlement
  • Tor + I2P
  • Non-custodial
  • Open source
  • No registration
Categories
  • Telegram P2P (Lightning)
  • P2P
Audited by
Networks supported

Quick take

@lnp2pBot scores 92/99 and RetoSwap scores 89/99. Use this page as a starting point, then review each provider profile for ownership, warnings, and policy changes.