Skip to content
CUNICULA

FlokiNET vs IncogNET

FlokiNET has no identity verification recorded. IncogNET has no identity verification recorded. The table lists fees, limits, jurisdiction, source coverage, and recorded risks.

FlokiNET vs IncogNET privacy comparison
Metric
Document checkZero KYCZero KYC
Identity exposureLevel 0/4Level 0/4
Source coveragePartial evidencePartial evidence
Review sourceofficial siteofficial site
Recorded riskcautioncaution
JurisdictionISUS
FeeFrom €7.99/moVPN from USD 2/mo per location on a three-year term
LimitNone recordedNone recorded
Countries/regionsGlobalGlobal
Features
  • BTC accepted
  • Dedicated servers
  • Email required
  • Hosting in Iceland, Romania, Finland and the Netherlands
  • No government ID required
  • Shared hosting
  • Tor and onion hosting support
  • VPS
  • XMR accepted
  • ZEC accepted
  • BTC accepted
  • Dedicated servers
  • Email required; aliases accepted
  • No VPN traffic or DNS logging
  • US-based
  • VPS
  • WireGuard VPN
  • XMR accepted
Categories
  • Hosting
  • Hosting
Audited byNone recordedNone recorded
Networks supportedNone recordedNone recorded
Last reviewed2026-09-052026-09-05

How privacy, evidence, and risk are reported