Skip to content
CUNICULA
Back to directory

Cryptostorm vs Safing SPN

Head-to-head privacy comparison: KYC friction, trust score, jurisdiction, fees, audits, supported regions, and network support. Higher trust score: Cryptostorm.

Cryptostorm

Zero KYC · Trust 92/99

Token-based VPN with no account/email required for XMR purchase path, Tor/I2P site access, bare-metal servers, no-logs claim, and server/client-side multihop options.

VPN
Full profileVisit site

Safing SPN

Light KYC · Trust 80/99

Portmaster/SPN privacy network by Safing ICS Technologies GmbH. SPN uses per-connection multi-hop routing; pricing page says Bitcoin and Monero payments are supported alongside credit cards.

VPNPrivacy Tools
Full profileVisit site
Cryptostorm vs Safing SPN privacy comparison
MetricCryptostormSafing SPN
KYC levelZero KYCLight KYC
Trust score92/9980/99
Jurisdiction—AT
Fee——
Countries/regionsGlobalGlobal
Features
  • Token-based
  • No accounts
  • No email
  • Tor exit
  • Open-source
  • SPN multi-hop routing
  • Per-app routing
  • Open source
  • Portmaster firewall
  • Bitcoin payments
  • Monero payments
Categories
  • VPN
  • VPN
  • Privacy Tools
Audited by
  • —
  • —
Networks supported
  • —
  • —

Quick take

Cryptostorm scores 92/99 and Safing SPN scores 80/99. Use this page as a starting point, then review each provider profile for ownership, warnings, and policy changes.