Skip to content
CUNICULA
Back to directory

FlokiNET vs IncogNET

Head-to-head privacy comparison: KYC friction, trust score, jurisdiction, fees, audits, supported regions, and network support. Higher trust score: FlokiNET.

FlokiNET

Zero KYC · Trust 89/99

Offshore VPS and dedicated servers in Iceland, Romania and Finland. Strong data protection, outside primary surveillance networks. Accepts XMR, ZEC and BTC. (Zero KYC)

Hosting
Full profileVisit site

IncogNET

Zero KYC · Trust 49/99

Anonymous VPS and dedicated server hosting. Accepts XMR and BTC, no personal info required. No logs. (Zero KYC)

Hosting
Full profileVisit site
FlokiNET vs IncogNET privacy comparison
MetricFlokiNETIncogNET
KYC levelZero KYCZero KYC
Trust score89/9949/99
JurisdictionISUS
FeeFrom €7.99/moFree
Countries/regionsGlobalGlobal
Features
  • Iceland jurisdiction
  • Romania jurisdiction
  • Finland jurisdiction
  • XMR accepted
  • ZEC accepted
  • BTC accepted
  • Outside 14-Eyes
  • Strong data protection
  • Free speech
  • No data retention mandate
  • DMCA-resistant
  • XMR accepted
  • BTC accepted
  • Anonymous
  • VPS
  • Dedicated servers
  • No logs
  • US-based
  • DMCA-ignored
Categories
  • Hosting
  • Hosting
Audited by
  • —
  • —
Networks supported
  • —
  • —

Quick take

FlokiNET scores 89/99 and IncogNET scores 49/99. Use this page as a starting point, then review each provider profile for ownership, warnings, and policy changes.