Skip to content
CUNICULA
Back to directory

Cryptostorm vs Safing SPN

Head-to-head privacy comparison: KYC friction, trust score, jurisdiction, fees, audits, supported regions, and network support. Higher trust score: Cryptostorm.

Cryptostorm

Zero KYC · Trust 92/99

Token-based VPN — no accounts, no email, no identity. Buy a token, activate, connect. Supports Tor exit nodes. Open-source client.

VPN
Full profileVisit site

Safing SPN

Zero KYC · Trust 82/99

Privacy network with multi-hop routing and per-app VPN control. Includes Portmaster application firewall. Open-source.

VPNPrivacy Tools
Full profileVisit site
Cryptostorm vs Safing SPN privacy comparison
MetricCryptostormSafing SPN
KYC levelZero KYCZero KYC
Trust score92/9982/99
JurisdictionISAT
Fee——
Countries/regionsGlobalGlobal
Features
  • Token-based
  • No accounts
  • No email
  • Tor exit
  • Open-source
  • Multi-hop
  • Per-app routing
  • Open-source
  • Portmaster firewall
  • No accounts for basic
Categories
  • VPN
  • VPN
  • Privacy Tools
Audited by
  • —
  • —
Networks supported
  • —
  • —

Quick take

Cryptostorm scores 92/99 and Safing SPN scores 82/99. Use this page as a starting point, then review each provider profile for ownership, warnings, and policy changes.